Bowles v. Estes Express Lines Corporation
Plaintiff: Lisa Bowles
Defendant: Estes Express Lines Corporation
Case Number: 2:2022cv02660
Filed: September 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Annie T Christoff
Referring Judge: Sheryl H Lipman
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 TEXT ONLY ORDER GRANTING #18 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Brett Carpenter. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 11/18/2022. (shl)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice proposed order submitted (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-4016537) by Estes Express Lines Corporation. (Carpenter, Brett)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Estes Express Lines Corporation.(Garrett, Tim)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Woodard, David)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 NOTICE by Lisa Bowles NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Parish, Danny)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SETTING LETTER: A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has been SET for TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2022 at 2:30 P.M. (CST) before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. The conference will be held via Microsoft Teams Video. A link to the video conference will be emailed to the attorneys prior to the setting.If the parties consent to have the case heard by the magistrate, please file your consent and this conference will be cancelled.Counsel should be prepared to discuss all pending motions.PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED INSTRUCTIONS.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties should consult the instructions for #Joining a Meeting in Teams or #Joining a Meeting Without a Teams Account. (jpw)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ORDER GRANTING #12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by David Woodard. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 10/26/2022. (shl)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Second MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice proposed order submitted (Fee paid as part of previous filing) by Estes Express Lines Corporation. (Woodard, David)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice proposed order submitted (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3996969) filed by Estes Express Lines Corporation has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: (1) One of the certificates of good standing is more than 30 days old. Please resubmit entire motion with current certificates. (2) Motion contains wet signature of attorney. (3) Proposed order should be emailed to chambers, not published on the docket. This motion will be termed pending correct submission. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. (jae)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice proposed order submitted (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3996969) by Estes Express Lines Corporation. (Attachments: #1 proposed order submitted)(Woodard, David)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's State Law Claims of Negligence and Breach of Fiduciary Duty, to Deny Plaintiff's Request for a Jury Trial, and for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by Estes Express Lines Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum)(Garrett, Tim)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ATTACHMENT CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Complaint by Lisa Bowles.. (Parish, Danny)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #1 Complaint filed by Lisa Bowles has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: No signature of attorney on civil cover sheet; Please resubmit the civil cover sheet by selecting the 'Attachment' event on ECF. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (btg)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Estes Express Lines Corporation. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (btg)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (btg)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (btg)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (btg)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (btg)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3978091), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Parish, Danny)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bowles v. Estes Express Lines Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Bowles
Represented By: Danny Parish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Estes Express Lines Corporation
Represented By: Tim K. Garrett
Represented By: Brett Austin Carpenter
Represented By: David L. Woodard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?