United States of America v. Evolve Bank and Trust
| United States of America |
| Evolve Bank and Trust |
| 2:2022cv02667 |
| September 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Tu M Pham |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 10/17/2022. (shl) |
Filing 12
CONSENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 10/17/2022. (shl)
|
| Filing 11 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman: Microsoft Teams Video Motion Hearing held on 10/13/2022. Sara Lewenberg Niles and Eileen Kuo appeared for the Plaintiff. Jeffery P. Naimon and Robert L. Crawford appeared for the Defendant. #4 Joint Motion for Approval and Entry of Proposed Consent Order heard and taken under advisement. Order to be entered. (Court Reporter: April Lassiter-Benson) (jpw) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert L. Crawford on behalf of Evolve Bank and Trust (Crawford, Robert) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ONLY ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Jeffrey P. Naimon. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 10/7/2022. (shl)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice with proposed order submitted in word format by email to Judge Lipman (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3986960) by Evolve Bank and Trust. (Attachments: #1 DC Certificate of Good Standing, #2 USDC-DC Certificate of Good Standing)(Naimon, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 SETTING LETTER: A HEARING re: Proposed Consent Order has been SET before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman for THURSDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2022 at 2:00 P.M. (CDT). The hearing will be held via Microsoft Teams Video. A link to the video conference will be emailed to the attorneys prior to the setting.Counsel should submit any exhibits to be offered to the Judge's ECF mailbox prior to the proceeding.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties should consult the instructions for #Joining a Meeting in Teams or #Joining a Meeting Without a Teams Account. (jpw) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Settlement proposed order submitted by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit proposed Consent Order)(Niles, Sara) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 2 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Niles, Sara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Evolve Bank and Trust | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Sara Lewenberg Niles |
| Represented By: | Katherine Raimondo |
| Represented By: | Eileen Kuo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Evolve Bank and Trust | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey P. Naimon |
| Represented By: | Robert L. Crawford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
