Massengill v. Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.
Plaintiff: Crystal Massengill
Defendant: Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv02687
Filed: October 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Charmiane G Claxton
Referring Judge: Mark S Norris
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 [**TEXT ORDER ONLY -- NO IMAGE ATTACHED**] ORDER GRANTING #13 DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. For good cause shown, Defendant's unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall have up to and including January 4, 2023 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 12/2/22. (Norris, Mark)
December 1, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Complaint by Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Consultation)(Halijan, Douglas)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 [**TEXT ORDER ONLY -- NO IMAGE ATTACHED**] ORDER GRANTING #11 DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Defendant's unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall have up to and including December 5, 2022 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 11/2/22. (Norris, Mark)
November 2, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Complaint, Proposed Order Submitted by Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Consultation)(Halijan, Douglas)
November 2, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Douglas F. Halijan on behalf of Concorde Career Colleges, Inc. (Halijan, Douglas)
October 6, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy Worrell Sterling on behalf of Crystal Massengill (Sterling, Amy)
October 6, 2022 Filing 8 Notice of Correction to 3 Deficiency Notice,, . (Cochran, William)
October 6, 2022 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jae)
October 6, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae)
October 6, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae)
October 6, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae)
October 6, 2022 Filing 3 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #1 Complaint filed by Crystal Massengill has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: Civil cover sheet is not electronically signed by counsel. Please submit a signed civil cover sheet under the event "Notice of Correction". Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (jae)
October 6, 2022 Filing 2 Judge Mark S. Norris and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (jae)
October 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Crystal Massengill (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3985489), filed by Crystal Massengill. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons to Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.)(Cochran, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Massengill v. Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crystal Massengill
Represented By: Amy Worrell Sterling
Represented By: William E. Cochran, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.
Represented By: Douglas F. Halijan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?