Davis v. Tamrat et al
Michael Davis |
Asrat H. Tamrat and Tana Logistics, LLC |
Mary Bond Lonon |
2:2022cv02706 |
October 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
S Thomas Anderson |
Jon A York |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Entered in Error. |
Filing 7 Entered In Error. |
Note to all parties: This case was incorrectly opened in the Western Division of the Western District. It will be transferred to the Jackson office and the case number will be modified modified. Please take notice of the case number as the only change in the number will be the divisional code at the beginning of the case number. (Ex: 1:XX-cv-XXXX or 2:XX-cv-XXXX). The old case has been closed and contains a case flag that it is closed. Particular attention should be used when selecting the case number during CM/ECF filing of future pleadings to ensure that you are filing in the correct (open) case. The number case number is 1:22cv2706 STA/jay. Please list the correct cast number on all future pleadings. (jae) |
Intradistrict Transfer to Easter Division of Western District of Tennessee (jae) |
Filing 6 Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jon A. York added. Judge Sheryl H. Lipman no longer assigned to case. (jae) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (mlk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (mlk) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mlk) |
Filing 2 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (mlk) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Tamrat, Asrat from Haywood County Circuit Court, case number 22-cv-4742 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3991087), filed by Tamrat, Asrat. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Circuit Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice of Appearance for Defendants, #3 Exhibit Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Coversheet)(O'Brien, Garrett) Modified on 10/14/2022 (McDaniel, Aaron). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.