Barnes v. Oak Court Mall, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Danielle Barnes
Defendant: Oak Court Mall, LLC, Universal Protection Service, LLC d/b/a Allied Universal Security Services,, The Woodmont Company, Inc. and Washington Prime Group
Not Classified By Court: Jamita Swearengen
Case Number: 2:2022cv02852
Filed: December 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Jon Phipps McCalla
Referring Judge: Tu M Pham
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Order GRANTING #19 Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 12/28/2022. (wrb)
December 27, 2022 Filing 19 MOTION to Remand by Danielle Barnes. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Consultation)(Sanford, Mari-Elizabeth)
December 27, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Lewis Wilkinson Lyons on behalf of Oak Court Mall, LLC, Washington Prime Group (Lyons, Lewis)
December 22, 2022 Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Oak Court Mall, LLC, Washington Prime Group. (Wallis, Edwin)
December 22, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Edwin E. Wallis, III on behalf of Oak Court Mall, LLC, Washington Prime Group (Wallis, Edwin)
December 20, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael R. Marshall on behalf of The Woodmont Company, Inc. (Marshall, Michael)
December 20, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Mari-Elizabeth Sanford on behalf of Danielle Barnes (Sanford, Mari-Elizabeth)
December 20, 2022 Filing 13 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #11 Notice of Appearance filed by Danielle Barnes has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: the pleading has a hand written signature and not the required electronic signature. Also, the attorney referenced in the notice is not the name of the attorney on the signature line. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (agj)
December 19, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by David I. Feigelson on behalf of The Woodmont Company, Inc. (Feigelson, David)
December 16, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Mari-Elizabeth Sanford on behalf of Danielle Barnes (Sanford, Mari-Elizabeth)
December 16, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Howard Brett Manis on behalf of Danielle Barnes (Manis, Howard)
December 15, 2022 Filing 9 SETTING LETTER: A Telephonic Scheduling Conference has been set for Thursday, 1/26/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jon Phipps McCalla. To access the telephonic conference parties will dial 888-675-2535 and enter access code 7360481. Please call at least 5 minutes in advance of the conference time. (jrs)
December 15, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj)
December 15, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj)
December 15, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj)
December 15, 2022 Filing 5 Judge Jon Phipps McCalla and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (agj)
December 15, 2022 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Universal Protection Service, LLC. (Burd, James)
December 15, 2022 Filing 3 Defendant Universal Protection Service, LLC D/B/A Allied Security's Answer and Affirmative Defenses ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Universal Protection Service, LLC.(Burd, James)
December 15, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James Mitchell Burd on behalf of Universal Protection Service, LLC (Burd, James)
December 15, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Universal Protection Service, LLC from Shelby County Circuit Court, case number CT-4369-22 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-4033846), filed by Universal Protection Service, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Burd, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnes v. Oak Court Mall, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Jamita Swearengen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Barnes
Represented By: Andrew C. Clarke
Represented By: Howard Brett Manis
Represented By: Mari-Elizabeth Sanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oak Court Mall, LLC
Represented By: Lewis Wilkinson Lyons
Represented By: Edwin E. Wallis, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Universal Protection Service, LLC d/b/a Allied Universal Security Services,
Represented By: James Mitchell Burd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Woodmont Company, Inc.
Represented By: Michael R. Marshall
Represented By: David I. Feigelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washington Prime Group
Represented By: Edwin E. Wallis, III
Represented By: Lewis Wilkinson Lyons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?