Hayes et al v. The Kroger Co. et al
| Eloise Stover Hayes and David Hayes |
| The Kroger Co., Kroger Limited Partnership I and Kroger |
| T. J. Jones |
| 2:2022cv02865 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Mark S Norris |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for Friday, 03/03/2023 at 09:30 AM before Judge Mark S. Norris. The proceeding will be held via Microsoft Teams video conference. The Court will email the parties an invitation for the video conference prior to the proceeding.Counsel should submit any exhibits to be offered to the Judge's ECF mailbox prior to the proceeding.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties should consult the instructions for #Joining a Meeting in Teams or #Joining a Meeting Without a Teams Account. (zsf) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Kroger, Kroger Limited Partnership I, The Kroger Co. of Service of Defendants' First Set of Discovery to Plaintiffs (Deakins, Laura) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by All Defendants.(Deakins, Laura) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 3 Judge Mark S. Norris and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (agj) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Lampton Deakins on behalf of All Defendants (Deakins, Laura) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Dyer County Circuit Court, case number 22-CV-58 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-4038439), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Documents)(Vescovo, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
