Abegunde v. United States of America
Petitioner: Olufolajimi Abegunde
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2022cv02879
Filed: December 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Annie T Christoff
Referring Judge: Sheryl H Lipman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION Motion for the Reinstatement and Utilization of Movant's Original Oversized Memorandum of Law in Support of Movant's 2255 Petition filed by Olufolajimi Abegunde. (mlk)
February 16, 2023 Filing 11 USCA Case Number 23-5135 for #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Olufolajimi Abegunde. (agj)
February 10, 2023 Filing 10 PRO SE NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #9 Order on Motion to Disqualify Judge by Olufolajimi Abegunde. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae)
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying #4 Motion to Disqualify Judge. Signed by Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 1/30/23. (shl)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE, STAYING GOVERNMENT'S OBLIGATION TO RESPOND TO 2255 MOTION AND STRIKING MOVANT'S LEGAL MEMORANDUM AND DIRECTING HIM TO REFILE. Signed by Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 1/26/2023. (shl)
January 24, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Pro Se Complaint [Proposed Order Submitted] by United States of America. (Smith, Scott)
January 24, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Patrick Smith on behalf of United States of America (Smith, Scott)
January 19, 2023 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support re #1 MOTION Under SEC 2255 To Vacate, SET Aside, or Correct Sentence By A Person in Federal Custody filed by Olufolajimi Abegunde. (mlk) Modified on 1/23/2023 (jae).
January 19, 2023 Filing 4 Pro Se Motion for Disqualification of U.S. District Judge Sheryl H. Lipman Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 455(a) filed by Olufolajimi Abegunde. (mlk)
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING UNITED STATES TO RESPOND. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 1/5/2023. (shl)
December 30, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf)
December 30, 2022 Filing 1 PRO SE Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence against United States of America, filed by Olufolajimi Abegunde. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Judicial Cards)(csf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abegunde v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Olufolajimi Abegunde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: 2255 AUSA
Represented By: Scott Patrick Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?