DSG Commercial ECO Cleaning Systems, Inc. v. DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC.
| DSG Commercial ECO Cleaning Systems, Inc. |
| DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC. |
| Jamita Swearengen |
| 2:2023cv02093 |
| February 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Mark S Norris |
| Tu M Pham |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Jan-Pro Unit Franchise Agreement, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B - Pricing Agreement (between DHL and Jan-Pro))(Lew, Isaac)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Isaac Salomon Lew on behalf of DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC. (Lew, Isaac)
|
|
Filing 7
[TEXT ORDER ONLY -- NO IMAGE ATTACHED**] ORDER GRANTING #6 DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Defendant's unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall have up to and including March 29, 2023 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 2/22/23. (Norris, Mark)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Repond to Complaint proposed order submitted by DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC.. (Vescovo, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae)
|
|
Filing 2
Judge Mark S. Norris and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC. from Shelby County Circuit Court, case number CT-5135-22 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-4078081), filed by DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vescovo, Nicholas)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
