Lusk v. CITY OF MEMPHIS et al
| Bobby Lusk |
| CITY OF MEMPHIS, Shelby County, Chris Simmons, Antoine Smith, R. Ross, N. Bond and John Does |
| 2:2023cv02148 |
| March 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance by Deborah E. Godwin on behalf of N. Bond (Godwin, Deborah) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Elizabeth McKinney on behalf of N. Bond (McKinney, Mary) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by Barbaralette G. Davis on behalf of CITY OF MEMPHIS (Davis, Barbaralette) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Barbaralette G. Davis on behalf of CITY OF MEMPHIS (Davis, Barbaralette) |
Filing 22
TEXT-ONLY ORDER GRANTING #15 DEFENDANT OFFICER NIGEL BOND'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Defendant shall have until June 1, 2023, to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff on 5/2/2023. (mpk)
|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Burnett Joiner on behalf of Shelby County, Chris Simmons, Antoine Smith (Joiner, Michael) |
| Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bobby Lusk as to N. Bond. (agj) |
| Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bobby Lusk as to Antoine Smith. (agj) |
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bobby Lusk as to Chris Simmons. (agj) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bobby Lusk as to Shelby County. (agj) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bobby Lusk as to CITY OF MEMPHIS. (agj) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Proposed Order Submitted by N. Bond. (McKinney, Mary) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by Shelby County, Chris Simmons, Antoine Smith.(Chandler, Raven) |
| Filing 13 Defendant City of Memphis' ANSWER to Complaint by CITY OF MEMPHIS.(Davis, Barbaralette) |
| Filing 12 Agreement to Receive NOTICE of Electronic Filing filed by Bobby Lusk. (mlk) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (mlk) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (mlk) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mlk) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Officer N. Bond. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer was given the issued summons in order to effect service. (mlk) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Officer R. Ross. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer was given the issued summons in order to effect service. (mlk) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Antoine Smith. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer was given the issued summons in order to effect service. (mlk) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Chris Simmons. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer was given the issued summons in order to effect service. (mlk) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Shelby County. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer was given the issued summons in order to effect service. (mlk) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CITY OF MEMPHIS. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer was given issued summons in order to effect service. (mlk) |
| Filing 2 Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (mlk) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402.), filed by Bobby Lusk. (Attachments: #1 Receipt)(mlk) |
| CLERK'S REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Clerk's review of preliminary matters completed. (csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
