Henry v. State of Tennessee et al
| Calvin Henry, Jr. |
| State of Tennessee, Shelby County, Mayor Lee Harris, Shelby County Sheriff Office Jail Division, Sheriff Floyd Bonner and Chief Kirk Fields |
| 2:2023cv02256 |
| April 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and assessing $350 filing fee in accordance with PLRA, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 5/18/2023. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Calvin Henry, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit trust fund statement)(jae) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Floyd Bonner, Kirk Fields, Lee Harris, Shelby County, Shelby County Sheriff Office Jail Division, State of Tennessee, filed by Calvin Henry, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 envelope)(jae) |
| Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-01 case reassigned to Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham. (jae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
