Cager et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. et al
| Wilhelmina Cager, Wilhelmina Cager, Next of Friend of AJani Brandon, Ajani Brandon, A Minor and A.B. |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart Supercenter #5196, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and John Doe 4 |
| Jamita Swearengen |
| 2:2023cv02301 |
| May 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wilhelmina Cager, Wilhelmina Cager(Next of Friend of A.B. ), A.B. as to Wal-Mart Supercenter #5196. (Lewter, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wilhelmina Cager, Wilhelmina Cager(Next of Friend of A.B. ), A.B. as to Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.. (Lewter, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 16 Summons Issued as to THE GENERAL. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj) |
| Filing 15 Summons Issued as to Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Summons by Geoffrey Lewter on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Lewter, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Summons by Geoffrey Lewter on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Lewter, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wilhelmina Cager, Wilhelmina Cager(Next of Friend of A.B. ), A.B. as to Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons Wal-Mart Stores Inc. - Served 6-27-23, #2 Summons Wal-Mart Associates Inc. - Served 6-27-23, #3 Summons Wal-Mart Stores East - Served 6-27-23)(Lewter, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Supercenter #5196. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Summons by Geoffrey Lewter on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons - Wal-Mart Supecenter 5196, #2 Summons Wal-Mart Associates Inc., #3 Summons Wal-Mart East L.P., #4 Summons Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., #5 Summons John Doe #1, #6 Summons John Doe #2, #7 Summons John Doe #3, #8 Summons John Doe #4)(Lewter, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 9 SETTING LETTER: A TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference is set for 8/1/2023 at 02:00 PM before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. (Mays, Samuel) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P..(Reviere, Russell) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Correction to 3 Deficiency Notice,, 1 Notice of Removal, Redacted. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet redacted, #2 Exhibit Complaint and Summons redacted)(Reviere, Russell) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 3 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document 1 Notice of Removal, filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: Notice of removal contains names of minors, which should be redacted to only first and last name initials. Filer should redact minor's names and publish a notice of correction. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (jae) |
| Filing 2 Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
