Pauline Holding, LLC v. Trisura Specialty Insurance Company (TSIC) et al
| Pauline Holding, LLC |
| Trisura Specialty Insurance Company (TSIC), Trisura Insurance Company (TIC), Trisura Group Ltd. and Trisura (US) Holding Company Inc. |
| 2:2023cv02333 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Mark S Norris |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pauline Holding, LLC as to Trisura Specialty Insurance Company (TSIC). (Patel, Mital) |
| Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pauline Holding, LLC as to Trisura Insurance Company (TIC). (Patel, Mital) |
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pauline Holding, LLC as to Trisura (US) Holding Company Inc., Trisura Group Ltd.. (Patel, Mital) |
| Filing 17 Summons Issued as to Trisura Insurance Company (TIC), Trisura Specialty Insurance Company (TSIC). The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 TSIC)(agj) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Summons by Mital Devendra Patel on behalf of Pauline Holding, LLC. (Patel, Mital) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Summons by Mital Devendra Patel on behalf of Pauline Holding, LLC. (Patel, Mital) |
| Filing 14 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #1 Complaint filed by Pauline Holding, LLC has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: Filer failed to add additional party to the docket as listed on the complaint. Clerk's office has now added that party. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. (jae) |
| Filing 13 Summons Issued as to Trisura Group Ltd., Trisura Insurance Company (TIC), Trisura Specialty Insurance Company (TSIC). The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons)(jae) |
| Filing 12 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #8 Attachment filed by Pauline Holding, LLC, #7 Attachment filed by Pauline Holding, LLC, #6 Attachment filed by Pauline Holding, LLC has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: : Correct event for requesting summons to be issued is found under "other filings", "Notice", "Notice of Summons". When you select the correct event, the clerk's staff is immediately notified of the filing and can issue summons. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. (jae) |
| Filing 11 ATTACHMENT Exhibit C - Reservation of Rights Letter to #1 Complaint by Pauline Holding, LLC.. (Patel, Mital) |
| Filing 10 ATTACHMENT Exhibit B - underlying Complaint for Money Damages to #1 Complaint by Pauline Holding, LLC.. (Patel, Mital) |
| Filing 9 ATTACHMENT Exhibit A - Insurance Policy to #1 Complaint by Pauline Holding, LLC.. (Patel, Mital) |
| Filing 8 ATTACHMENT Summons for Trisura Group Ltd. c/o Trisura (US) Holding Company, Inc. to #1 Complaint by Pauline Holding, LLC.. (Patel, Mital) |
| Filing 7 ATTACHMENT Summons for Trisura Insurance Company (TIC) to #1 Complaint by Pauline Holding, LLC.. (Patel, Mital) |
| Filing 6 ATTACHMENT Summons for Trisura Specialty Insurance Company (TSIC) to #1 Complaint by Pauline Holding, LLC.. (Patel, Mital) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 2 Judge Mark S. Norris and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (jae) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pauline Holding, LLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-4152893), filed by Pauline Holding, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Patel, Mital) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
