Eason v. Bowers
| Warden Bowers |
| Marcus Lamont Eason |
| Warden of FCI McDowell |
| 2:2023cv02396 |
| June 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint Response to 28 U.S.C. 2241 Petition seeking Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction by Warden of FCI McDowell.(Morris, Mary) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Morris on behalf of Bowers (Morris, Mary) |
Filing 4
ORDER MODIFYING THE DOCKET AND DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO RESPOND TO #1 PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241. Signed by Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 8/8/2023. (shl)
|
| Filing 3 Case initiation fee: PAID $ 5.00, receipt number 200001835 (csf) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 against Bowers, filed by Marcus Lamont Eason. (Attachments: #1 Order Construing Memorandum as a 2241 Petition, #2 Envelope, #3 Case assignment label)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
