Moore v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
| Katherine Moore |
| Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. |
| Jamita Swearengen |
| 2:2023cv02428 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Jon Phipps McCalla |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Summons Issued as to Toyota Motor Corporation. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jae) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Summons by Danny Parish on behalf of Katherine Moore. (Parish, Danny) |
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 9/1/2023. (wrb)
|
| Filing 12 SETTING LETTER: A Jury Trial has been set for Monday, 1/27/2025 at 9:30 AM before Judge Jon Phipps McCalla in a courtroom to be determined. A Pretrial Conference has been set for Friday, 1/17/2025 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 7 - Memphis before Judge Jon Phipps McCalla. A Proposed Joint Pretrial Order will be due by 4:30 PM on 1/10/2025. (jrs) |
| Filing 11 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 8/31/2023. Daniel Parrish appeared for the plaintiff. Randolph Bibb, Jr. and Laura Deakins appeared for the defendants. This is a Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability case. The Court reviewed case information and the present location, condition, and status of the two autos in in question, a 2013 Toyota Corolla and a 2014 Nissan Maxima. Further, the Court briefly reviewed the complaint, possible damages, service issues related to a foreign corporation (Toyota). A probable agreement may be reached as to service. The Court discussed dates/deadlines and set a schedule. A Jury Trial is set for Monday, January 27, 2025 at 9:30 AM in a courtroom to be determined. The trial is expected to take 10 days. The Pretrial Conference is set for Friday, January 17, 2025 at 9:30 AM. The Proposed Joint Pretrial Conference is due by 4:30 PM on January 10, 2025. A Scheduling Order will be entered. (Court Reporter: Tina Gibson) (jrs) |
| Filing 10 SETTING LETTER: The Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for Thursday, August 31, 2023 has been RESET to 3:00 PM before Judge Jon Phipps McCalla. Time Change Only. To access the telephonic conference parties will dial 888-675-2535 and enter access code 7360481. Please call at least 5 minutes in advance of the conference time. (jrs) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Katherine Moore of Service of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures (Parish, Danny) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc..(Bibb, John) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc..(Bibb, John) |
| Filing 6 SETTING LETTER: A Telephonic Scheduling Conference has been set for Thursday, 8/31/2023 at 2:00 PM before Judge Jon Phipps McCalla. To access the telephonic conference parties will dial 888-675-2535 and enter access code 7360481. Please call at least 5 minutes in advance of the conference time. (jrs) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 2 Judge Jon Phipps McCalla and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (agj) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. from Shelby County Circuit Court, case number CT-4074-22 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-4186969), filed by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Supplement Written Notice to Adverse Parties)(Bibb, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
