United States of America v. Madison, Jr.
| United States of America |
| Minor David Madison, Jr. |
| 2:2023cv02444 |
| July 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Warren Campbell on behalf of Minor David Madison, Jr. (Campbell, Warren) |
| Filing 12 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #9 Notice of Appearance filed by Minor David Madison, Jr. has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: the CM/ECF user login name does not match the electronic signature on the pleading. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (agj) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Bartholomew J Kempf on behalf of Minor David Madison, Jr. (Kempf, Bartholomew) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by George Coble Caperton on behalf of Minor David Madison, Jr. (Caperton, George) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Warren Campbell on behalf of Minor David Madison, Jr. (Campbell, Warren) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by United States of America. Minor David Madison, Jr. waiver sent on 8/4/2023, answer due 10/3/2023. (Beerbower, John) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 4 Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (agj) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by James Robertson MacAyeal on behalf of United States of America (MacAyeal, James) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Eliot Beerbower on behalf of United States of America (Beerbower, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Minor David Madison, Jr., filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Calkins, Audrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
