Ochoa et al v. Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC et al
| Lorena Ochoa, The Estate of Carlos Ochoa and Yolisma Ochoa |
| Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC, Jorge De Ochoa, Jorge De Ochoa, Jr. and Romeo De Ochoa |
| 2:2023cv02592 |
| September 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Tu M Pham |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MEMORANDUM in Support re #19 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC, Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC, Jorge De Ochoa, Romeo De Ochoa, Jorge De Ochoa, Jr.. (Yoakum, Brian) |
| Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC, Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC, Jorge De Ochoa, Romeo De Ochoa, Jorge De Ochoa, Jr.. (Yoakum, Brian) |
| Filing 18 SETTING LETTER: A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has been SET for MONDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2023 at 10:30 A.M. before Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman in Courtroom No. 1, on the 11th floor of the Federal Building, Memphis, Tennessee.If the parties consent to have the case heard by the magistrate, please file your consent and this conference will be cancelled.Counsel should be prepared to discuss all pending motions.PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED INSTRUCTIONS.(mmm) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Regan S Steepleton on behalf of Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC, Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC, Jorge De Ochoa, Romeo De Ochoa, Jorge De Ochoa, Jr. (Steepleton, Regan) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph T Getz on behalf of Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC, Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC, Jorge De Ochoa, Romeo De Ochoa, Jorge De Ochoa, Jr. (Getz, Joseph) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian L. Yoakum on behalf of Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC, Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC, Jorge De Ochoa, Romeo De Ochoa, Jorge De Ochoa, Jr. (Yoakum, Brian) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Lorena Ochoa, Yolisma Ochoa, The Estate of Carlos Ochoa to Jorge De Ochoa, Jr. (Walker, Patrick) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Lorena Ochoa, Yolisma Ochoa, The Estate of Carlos Ochoa to Jorge De Ochoa, Sr. (Walker, Patrick) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Lorena Ochoa, Yolisma Ochoa, The Estate of Carlos Ochoa to Romeo De Ochoa (Walker, Patrick) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Lorena Ochoa, Yolisma Ochoa, The Estate of Carlos Ochoa to Classic Tile & Plaster of Mississippi (Walker, Patrick) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Lorena Ochoa, Yolisma Ochoa, The Estate of Carlos Ochoa to Classic Tile & Plaster of Tennessee (Walker, Patrick) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC and Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(mf) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Summons by Patrick G. Walker on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Walker, Patrick) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Summons by Patrick G. Walker on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Walker, Patrick) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Jorge De Ochoa, Romeo De Ochoa, Jorge De Ochoa, Jr.. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons)(jae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 2 Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-4237872), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Walker, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
