Burl v. Abram et al
Miko Burl |
Kimberly Abram and JKF Trucking, LLC |
Jamita Swearengen |
2:2023cv02641 |
October 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Charmiane G Claxton |
Thomas L Parker |
Tu M Pham |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added pursuant to DE #11 . (agj) |
Filing 11 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton recused.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton on 11/20/2023. (Claxton, Charmiane) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by JKF Trucking, LLC.(Fargotstein, Samuel) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Kimberly Abram. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Summons by Louis Chiozza, Jr on behalf of Miko Burl. (Chiozza, Louis) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
Filing 4 COURTESY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #1 Notice of Removal, filed by JKF Trucking, LLC has been filed. For future reference, please note : Filer failed to add electronic signature to the civil cover sheet. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. Filer is not required to resubmit document. (jae) |
Filing 3 Judge Thomas L. Parker and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (jae) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JKF Trucking, LLC. (Fargotstein, Samuel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JKF Trucking, LLC from Circuit Court of Shelby County, Tennessee, case number CT-2900-23 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-4253141), filed by JKF Trucking, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A- Complaint and Summonses, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Fargotstein, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.