Pittmann Dusablon v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Sally S. Pittmann Dusablon |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2023cv02699 |
| November 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Tu M Pham |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 SETTING LETTER: A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has been SET for FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2024 at 4:00 P.M. before Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman.The conference will be held via Microsoft Teams Video. A link to the video conference will be emailed to the attorneys prior to the setting.If the parties consent to have the case heard by the magistrate, please file your consent and this conference will be cancelled.PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT.(mmm) |
| Filing 11 SSA CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD in answer to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Transcript Index, #2 Admin Docs, #3 Payment Docs and Decisions, #4 Juris Docs, #5 Non-Dis Development, #6 Disability-Related Development, #7 Medical Records 1/2, #8 Medical Records 2/2)(Golden, Dennis) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Dennis Golden on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Golden, Dennis) |
Filing 9
TEXT ONLY ORDER GRANTING #8 Amended Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Stephen M. Sloan. Signed by Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 11/8/2023. (shl)
|
| Filing 8 Amended MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Fee paid as part of previous filing) by Sally S. Pittmann Dusablon. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing 1, #2 Certificate of Good Standing 2)(Sloan, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Administrative track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 6 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 USC 405(g), effective December 1, 2022, Defendant has 60 days to file an answer, which may be limited to a certified copy of the administrative record, and to any affirmative defenses under Civil Rule 8(c). Plaintiff must file and serve on the Commissioner a brief for the requested relief within 30 days after the answer is filed or 30 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion filed under Rule 4(c), whichever is later. The Commissioner must file a brief and serve it on Plaintiff within 30 days after service of Plaintiff's brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief and serve it on the Commissioner within 14 days after service of the Commissioner's brief. The Parties' briefs must support assertions of fact by citations to particular parts of the record. Federal Rule 6(b)(1) remains available to the parties. To the extent not superseded by the Supplemental Rules, the Local Rules of the Court remain in effect for Social Security Appeals. Signed by Clerk of Court on 11/2/2023. (jae) |
| Filing 5 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-4272247) filed by Sally S. Pittmann Dusablon has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: PHV motions must contain two current certificates of good standing. This motion will be termed and filer must resubmit motion along with the two required certificates. (you can by-pass the payment screen) A proposed order must also be emailed to chambers in word format. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (jae) |
| Filing 4 Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-4272247) by Sally S. Pittmann Dusablon. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Sloan, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sally S. Pittmann Dusablon. (Sloan, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration, filed by Sally S. Pittmann Dusablon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sloan, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pittmann Dusablon v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sally S. Pittmann Dusablon | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Martin Sloan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Dennis Golden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
