Vrancea v. Bowers
| Ion Catalin Vrancea |
| F. J. Bowers and Warden C. Harrison |
| 2:2023cv02701 |
| November 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of substitution of respondent by Ion Catalin Vrancea (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae) |
| Filing 6 Case initiation fee: PAID $ 5.00, receipt number 200002888 (csf) |
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS AFFIDAVIT AND TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR PAY THE $5.00 HABEAS CORPUS FILING FEE. Signed by Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 11/9/2023. (shl)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Morris on behalf of F. J. Bowers (Morris, Mary) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 2 Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (jae) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 against F. J. Bowers, filed by Ion Catalin Vrancea. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 envelope)(jae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
