Stearsman et al v. Uponor, Inc.
Darin Stearsman and Juliana stearsman |
Uponor, Inc. |
Jamita Swearengen |
2:2023cv02777 |
December 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Charmiane G Claxton |
Mark S Norris |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 [**TEXT ORDER ONLY -- NO IMAGE ATTACHED**] ORDER GRANTING #13 UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OR DISMISS. For good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall have up to and including February 23, 2024 in which to respond. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 2/9/24. (Norris, Mark) |
Filing 13 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (UNCONTESTED) TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS OR COMPEL ARBITRATION (proposed order submitted) by Darin Stearsman, Juliana stearsman. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(King, James) |
Filing 12 [**TEXT ORDER ONLY -- NO IMAGE ATTACHED**] ORDER GRANTING #11 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OR DISMISS. Plaintiffs' unopposed Motion is well-taken and hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall have up to and including February 8, 2024 in which to respond to #6 Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration or Alternatively to Dismiss the Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 1/24/24. (Norris, Mark) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss (proposed order submitted) by Darin Stearsman, Juliana stearsman. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(King, James) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Compel Arbitration filed by Uponor, Inc.. (Pippenger, Mark) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Uponor, Inc.. (Pippenger, Mark) |
Filing 8 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Memorandum of Law filed by Uponor, Inc. has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: Document is not a motion and should not have been submitted under that event. Filer could have either attached the memorandum to the motion as an exhibit or used the event "Memorandum in support of Motion" found under civil event, motions and related filings, responses and replies". Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. (jae) |
Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Memorandum of Law by Uponor, Inc.. (Pippenger, Mark) |
Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Compel Arbitration by Uponor, Inc.. (Pippenger, Mark) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj) |
Filing 2 Judge Mark S. Norris and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (agj) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Uponor, Inc. from Circuit Court, case number CT-4622-23 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNWDC-4302393), filed by Uponor, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court File, #2 Exhibit State Docket, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pippenger, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.