Mourning v. Downtown Memphis Commission et al
| Sharon Mourning |
| Downtown Memphis Commission, CITY OF MEMPHIS and James Harden |
| 2:2023cv02784 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Mark S Norris |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Agreement for 30-Day Extension by CITY OF MEMPHIS. (Rudnick, Elizabeth) |
Filing 10
[**TEXT ORDER ONLY - NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED**] ORDER GRANTING #8 DEFENDANT DOWNTOWN MEMPHIS COMMISSION'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. The Court finds the motion well taken, and it is GRANTED. Defendant Downtown Memphis Commission shall have up to and including February 16, 2024 to file a responsive pleading. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 2/2/2024. (Norris, Mark)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul E. Prather on behalf of Downtown Memphis Commission (Prather, Paul) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint [Proposed] Order Submitted by Downtown Memphis Commission. (O'Brien, Sean) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to CITY OF MEMPHIS, Downtown Memphis Commission, James Harden. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Summons by Terrell L. Tooten on behalf of Sharon Mourning. (Attachments: #1 Summons James Harden, #2 Summons Downtown Memphis Commission)(Tooten, Terrell) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 2 Judge Mark S. Norris and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (agj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNWDC-4304638), filed by Sharon Mourning. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Tooten, Terrell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
