Shekhovtsov v. Apple Inc.
| Stanislav Shekhovtsov |
| Apple Inc. |
| 2:2024cv02095 |
| February 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Mark S Norris |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 RESPONSE in Opposition re #22 Second MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (and for lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficient service of process, and improper venue in addition to failure to state a claim) filed by Stanislav Shekhovtsov. (agj) |
| Filing 24 ATTACHMENT to #23 Amended Complaint by Stanislav Shekhovtsov.. (agj) |
| Filing 23 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple Inc., filed by Stanislav Shekhovtsov.(agj) |
| Filing 22 Second MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (and for lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficient service of process, and improper venue in addition to failure to state a claim) by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum in Support of Second Motion to Dismiss)(Chapski, Robert) |
| Filing 21 Plaintiff's 2nd Set of Admissions and REQUEST for Production of Documents by Stanislav Shekhovtsov.(agj) |
| Filing 20 Plaintiff FIRST Set of Interrogatories REQUEST for Admissions and REQUEST for Production of Documents by Stanislav Shekhovtsov.(agj) |
| Filing 19 MOTION to Amend #1 Pro Se Complaint by Stanislav Shekhovtsov. (Attachments: #1 amended complaint, #2 Exhibit postal receipts)(agj) |
| Filing 18 Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr added. (jae) |
Filing 17
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 03/19/2024. (ach)
|
| Filing 16 Judge Thomas L. Parker added. (jae) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Mark S. Norris recused. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 3/7/24. (Norris, Mark)
|
| Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Apple Inc.. (Chapski, Robert) |
| Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (and for lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficient service of process, and improper venue in addition to failure to state a claim) by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in support of motion to dismiss)(Chapski, Robert) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE Opting Out of ADR Plan by Stanislav Shekhovtsov (agj) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stanislav Shekhovtsov as to Apple Inc.. (agj) |
| Filing 10 Judge Mark S. Norris added. (jae) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Jon Phipps McCalla recused. Signed by Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 2/13/2024. (msr)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Apple Inc.. The issued summonses were given to the Plaintiff to perfect service. (agj) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Signed Agreement to Receive Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by Stanislav Shekhovtsov (agj) |
| Filing 3 Case initiation fee: $ 405.00, receipt number 200003434 (agj) |
| Filing 2 Judge Jon Phipps McCalla and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (agj) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Apple Inc., filed by Stanislav Shekhovtsov.(agj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shekhovtsov v. Apple Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stanislav Shekhovtsov | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Apple Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Robert F. Chapski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
