Duttko et al v. MADD Assets, LLC
| Robert E. Duttko and Mildred E. Duttko |
| MADD Assets, LLC |
| 2:2024cv02096 |
| February 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Duttko against MADD Assets, LLC (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNWDC-4342636), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Summons, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cobb, James) |
| Intradistrict Transfer to Eastern Division (agj) |
| NOTICE to all parties: This case was incorrectly opened in the Western Division of the Western District. It was transferred to the Jackson Office and the case number has been modified. Please take notice of the case number, as the only change in the number will be the divisional code at the beginning of the case number. (Ex: 1:XX-cv-XXXX or 2:XX-cv-XXXX). The old case has been closed and will contain a case flag that it is closed. Particular attention should be used when selecting the case number during CM/ECF filing of future pleading to ensure that you are filing in the correct (open) Case. The new case number is 1:24-cv-2096. Please list the correct case number on all future pleadings. (agj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
