Phillips v. Sieg et al
2:2024cv02776 |
October 15, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Samuel H Mays |
Tu M Pham |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 OPPS - published in error (jae). |
Filing 8 USCA Case Number 24-6106 for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Stephen Phillips. (jae) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Order by Stephen Phillips. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Alter or Amend Judgment by Stephen Phillips. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for violation of civil rights under 42 USC 1983 against Correction Officers, Jane and John Doe, Amy Sieg, filed by Stephen Phillips. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae) |
Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-01 case reassigned to Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham. (jae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Phillips v. Sieg et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.