Shelton v. Leon et al
1:2006cv00344 |
June 22, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Marcia A. Crone |
Keith F. Giblin |
Plaintiff |
U.S. Government Defendant |
28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ordered that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is granted to the extent plaintiff requests the dismissal be without prejudice. Plaintiff's objections are overruled and the motion for reconsideration is denied in all other respects. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 2/24/12. (mrp, ) |
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. After careful consideration, the court is of the opinion that plaintiff's objections lack merit and should be overruled. The court finds the order of the magistrate judge neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. It is therefore ordered that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 2/6/10. (mrp, ) |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and the complaint be dismissed. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/28/08. (mrp, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shelton v. Leon et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.