Utilities Optimization Group, LLC v. Temple-Inland Inc
Plaintiff: Utilities Optimization Group, LLC
Defendant: Temple-Inland Inc
Case Number: 1:2008cv00068
Filed: February 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Beaumont Office
County: Angelina
Presiding Judge: Thad Heartfield
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 187 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Order denying 180 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Post Verdict filed by TIN, Inc.. Signed by Judge Thad Heartfield on 3/5/2010. (bjc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Utilities Optimization Group, LLC v. Temple-Inland Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Utilities Optimization Group, LLC
Represented By: Rebecca Clausen Kinchen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Temple-Inland Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?