Cheatum v. Blanda et al
| Ethel D Cheatum |
| Kenny Blanda, Alice Young and Judy Mason |
| 1:2008cv00299 |
| June 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Jefferson |
| Marcia A. Crone |
| Earl S. Hines |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's objection is overruled, and the report of the magistrate judge is adopted. The court will dismiss plaintiff's Title VII claims against Cantex Senior Communities LLC and Cresthaven Health Care Center Ltd. Co. for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and enter a final judgment. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 5/27/10. (mrp, )
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 28 Motion to Dismiss filed by Cantex Senior Communities LLC and Cresthaven Health Care Center Ltd Co, is GRANTED PARTIALLY w/respect to pla's defamation claims and DENIED w/respect to pla's Title VII claims. 17 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Robin Underhill, Alice Young, Kenny Blanda, Judy Mason, David F Ericken is GRANTED. Dfts Judy Mason, Robin Underhill, Alice Young, Kenny Blanda and David F Ericken are terminated. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 3/23/10. (pkb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
