Koumjian v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division 1:2008cv00373 | US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Eastern District Koumjian v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Koumjian v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Petitioner:	Paul James Koumjian
Respondent:	Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number:	1:2008cv00373
Filed:	July 3, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	Marcia A. Crone
Presiding Judge:	Earl S. Hines
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 25, 2010	Filing 31 MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the petition be denied. The factual and legal questions raised by petitioner have been consistently resolved adversely to his position and the questions presented are not worthy of encouragement to proceed further. A certificate of appealability shall not issue in this matter. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 10/25/10. (mrp, )
August 25, 2009	Filing 15 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that respondent's motion to dismiss is denied. The respondent shall, within 30 days of the date set forth below, file a response addressing the merits of the petition. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 8/25/09. (mrp, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 25, 2010

Filing 31 MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the petition be denied. The factual and legal questions raised by petitioner have been consistently resolved adversely to his position and the questions presented are not worthy of encouragement to proceed further. A certificate of appealability shall not issue in this matter. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 10/25/10. (mrp, )

August 25, 2009

Filing 15 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that respondent's motion to dismiss is denied. The respondent shall, within 30 days of the date set forth below, file a response addressing the merits of the petition. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 8/25/09. (mrp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Koumjian v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Paul James Koumjian
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?