Shaw v. National City Bank
Plaintiff: Robert M Shaw
Defendant: National City Bank
Case Number: 1:2009cv00730
Filed: July 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Beaumont Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Marcia A. Crone
Presiding Judge: Earl S. Hines
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the court grant the plaintiff's motion to dismiss and enter judgment. It is further ordered that the reference to the magistrate judge is vacated. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 11/13/09. (mrp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shaw v. National City Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert M Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National City Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?