Quirk v. Woods et al
| Joshua M Quirk |
| Mitch Woods and Robert Stegall |
| 1:2010cv00068 |
| February 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Beaumont Office |
| Jefferson |
| Ron Clark |
| Keith F. Giblin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER adopting 93 Report and Recommendation and denying 65 Motion for Summary Judgment of deft Bruce Minter. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 7/14/14. (tkd, )
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 89 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment as to defendant Randle is denied. Defendant Randle's motion to set aside default and motion to file an out of time answer i s granted. Ordered that plaintiff's motion for default judgment as to defendant Stegall is granted with respect to the issue of liability. The Magistrate Judge is directed to conduct an evidentiary hearing with respect to the issue of damages. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 9/12/2013. (bjc)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting 36 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 11/1/11. (tkd, )
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 2/11/11. (tkd, )
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting 14 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 8/24/10. (tkd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
