Hardin v. Christus Health Southeast Texas St. Elizabeth
Plaintiff: Terry L Hardin
Defendant: Christus Health Southeast Texas St. Elizabeth
Case Number: 1:2010cv00596
Filed: September 28, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Beaumont Office
County: Hardin
Presiding Judge: Ron Clark
Presiding Judge: Earl S. Hines
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER OVERRULING PLA'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING the Magistrate's 29 Report and Recommendation. Christus' 23 MOTION for summary judgment is GRANTED and Pla's claims are DISMISSED w/prejudice. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 3/8/12. (pkb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hardin v. Christus Health Southeast Texas St. Elizabeth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry L Hardin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christus Health Southeast Texas St. Elizabeth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?