Johnson v. Thaler
Petitioner: Joe Isaac Johnson
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Case Number: 1:2011cv00144
Filed: March 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Beaumont Office
County: Bee
Presiding Judge: Marcia A. Crone
Presiding Judge: Earl S. Hines
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING TRANSFER. Petitioner was convicted and sentenced in Polk County which is located in the Lufkin Division of the Eastern District of Texas. The transfer of this action to the Lufkin Division would further justice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines on 7/27/11. (mrp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joe Isaac Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?