Catholic Diocese of Beaumont et al v. Sebelius et al
| Catholic Charities of Southeast Texas, Inc. and Catholic Diocese of Beaumont |
| Jacob J. Lew, Thomas Perez, Kathleen Sebelius, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Department of Treasury |
| 1:2013cv00709 |
| December 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Beaumont Office |
| Anderson |
| Ron Clark |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that pltfs are entitled to a permanent injunction. The Government is enjoined from applying or enforcing the regulations that require the Plaintiffs, their health plans, TPAs, or issuers, to provide or execute the self-certifica tion forms that enable or require the TPA or issuer to provide health insurance coverage for Plaintiff's employees for FDA-approved contraceptives, emergency contraceptives, products, or services under the requirements imposed in 42 U.S.C. 67; 300gg-13(a) (4), Pub. L. 11-148, § 1563(e)-(f), as well as the application of the penalties found in 26 U.S.C. §§ 4980D & 4980H, and 29 U.S.C. § 1132. Further ordered that all currently pending motions are denied as moot. A final judgment will be forthcoming. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 1/2/14. (tkd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
