Centralian Controls Pty, Ltd. v. Maverick International, Ltd.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Eastern District Centralian Controls Pty, Ltd. v. Maverick International, Ltd.

Centralian Controls Pty, Ltd. v. Maverick International, Ltd.

Plaintiff:	Centralian Controls Pty, Ltd.
Defendant:	Maverick International, Ltd.
Case Number:	1:2016cv00037
Filed:	February 12, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Beaumont Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	Marcia A. Crone
Nature of Suit:	Other Fraud
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 29, 2018	Filing 96 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that Centralian's and Maverick's Motions in Limine should be granted in part and denied in part. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 8/28/18. (mrp, )
March 21, 2018	Filing 69 ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is ordered that Maverick's objections 68 are overruled; the magistrate judge's 67 Report and Recommendation is adopted and Maverick's 49 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Maverick on Centralian's equitable estoppel defense. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Maverick on Centralian's breach of warranty claim. In all other respects, Maverick's motion is denied. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 3/20/18. (mrp, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 29, 2018

Filing 96 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that Centralian's and Maverick's Motions in Limine should be granted in part and denied in part. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 8/28/18. (mrp, )

March 21, 2018

Filing 69 ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is ordered that Maverick's objections 68 are overruled; the magistrate judge's 67 Report and Recommendation is adopted and Maverick's 49 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Maverick on Centralian's equitable estoppel defense. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Maverick on Centralian's breach of warranty claim. In all other respects, Maverick's motion is denied. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 3/20/18. (mrp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Centralian Controls Pty, Ltd. v. Maverick International, Ltd.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Centralian Controls Pty, Ltd.
Represented By:	Mark Lynn Merrell
Represented By:	Steven Robert Rech
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Maverick International, Ltd.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?