Richitelli v. Lara

Petitioner: Jay Anthony Richitelli
Respondent: Frank Lara
Case Number: 1:2017cv00507
Filed: November 30, 2017
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Office: Beaumont Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Keith F. Giblin
Presiding Judge: Thad Heartfield
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 29, 2017 32 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED that the 31 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted in full. It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court is directed to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 11/28/2017.(BAR) [Transferred from Arizona on 11/30/2017.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richitelli v. Lara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jay Anthony Richitelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Frank Lara
Represented By: Katherine V Foss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?