Bernard v. Guillory et al
Dustin Bernard, Sr |
FNU Duke, FNU Guillory and Jefferson County Correctional Facility |
1:2018cv00343 |
July 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Beaumont Office |
Jefferson |
Zack Hawthorn |
Thad Heartfield |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT that plaintiff take nothing and that this lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice as repetitious. All motions by any party not previously ruled on are denied. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 9/5/2018. (bjc, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER overruling objections and adopting the magistrate judge's #3 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 9/5/2018. (bjc, ) |
Filing 5 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by Dustin Bernard, Sr. (bjc, ) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Dustin Bernard, Sr on 7/20/2018 re #3 Report and Recommendation. (bjc, ) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending this lawsuit should be dismissed without prejudice as repetitious. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 7/17/2018. (bjc, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dustin Bernard, Sr. (bjc, ) |
Filing 1 42:1983 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Dustin Bernard, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bjc, ) |
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn (bjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.