Porras-Muniz v. QWarden FCC Beaumont Low
Petitioner: Jose Alfredo Porras-Muniz
Respondent: QWarden FCC Beaumont Low
Case Number: 1:2019cv00349
Filed: August 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Zack Hawthorn
Referring Judge: Thad Heartfield
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2019 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number TXE100019206 (aam, )
August 12, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC 2241, filed by Jose Alfredo Porras-Muniz (Clerk's note: page 9 is not legible)(tkd, )
August 12, 2019 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn pursuant to a Standing Order (tkd, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Porras-Muniz v. QWarden FCC Beaumont Low
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: QWarden FCC Beaumont Low
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Alfredo Porras-Muniz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?