Indorama Ventures Oxides LLC v. M/V Natchez Express, U.S. Official No. 127460, her engines, apparel, furniture, equipment, appurtenances, tackle, etc., in rem et al
Indorama Ventures Oxides LLC |
Genesis Marine, LLC, in personam and M/V Natchez Express, U.S. Official No. 127460, her engines, apparel, furniture, equipment, appurtenances, tackle, etc., in rem |
1:2020cv00054 |
February 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Michael J Truncale |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONSES Issued and emailed to pltf's attorney for service as to Genesis Marine, LLC, in personam, M/V Natchez Express, U.S. Official No. 127460, her engines, apparel, furniture, equipment, appurtenances, tackle, etc., in rem. (tkd, ) |
Filing 5 WARRANT issued. (fal, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Issuance of Warrant in rem and Authorizing the Issuance of Warrant of Arrest. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 2/14/20. (4 certified copies to USM) (fal, ) |
Filing 3 Emergency MOTION for Issuance of Warrant in rem by Indorama Ventures Oxides LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Warrant of Arrest, #3 Exhibit USM Form 285)(Dye, Phillip) (Main Document 3 replaced on 2/14/2020) (fal, ). |
Filing 2 ***FILED IN ERROR, PLEASE IGNORE. TO BE REFILED.***Emergency MOTION for Issuance of Warrant in rem by Indorama Ventures Oxides LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Warrant for Arrest of Vessel)(Dye, Phillip) Modified on 2/14/2020 (fal, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Original Verified Complaint against Genesis Marine, LLC, in personam, M/V Natchez Express, U.S. Official No. 127460, her engines, apparel, furniture, equipment, appurtenances, tackle, etc., in rem ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7663510.), filed by Indorama Ventures Oxides LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dye, Phillip) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (fal, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Indorama Ventures Oxides LLC v. M/V Natchez Express, U.S. Official No. 127460, her engines, apparel, furniture, equipment, appurtenances, tackle, etc., in rem et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Indorama Ventures Oxides LLC | |
Represented By: | Phillip Bruce Dye, Jr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Genesis Marine, LLC, in personam | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: M/V Natchez Express, U.S. Official No. 127460, her engines, apparel, furniture, equipment, appurtenances, tackle, etc., in rem | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.