Foshee et al v. Bay Correctional & Rehab Facility et al
Ray Hill, Floyd Foshee and Reginald I Parker |
FNU Cannelli, Bay Correctional & Rehab Facility, FNU Briscoe, FNU Dixon, GEO Group Inc and Allison Redeaux |
1:2020cv00375 |
September 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Zack Hawthorn |
Thad Heartfield |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER OF SEVERANCE. Plaintiffs Floyd Foshee and Reginald I. Parker shall proceed in separate actions. Ray Hill shall remain the plaintiff in this civil action number. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 10/19/2020. (kcv, ) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Floyd Foshee, Ray Hill, Reginald I Parker.(kcv, ) |
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable: Notice of Case Assignment sent to Floyd Foshee at Beaumont Center. Remailed to pltf at his new address. (tkd, ) |
Filing 4 LETTER from Ray Hill (tkd, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address by Floyd Foshee from Beaumont Center to c/o Ann Hatfield, 1482 CR 4106, Call, TX 75933. (tkd, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Floyd Foshee. (bjc, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ray Hill, Floyd Foshee.(bjc, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (bjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.