Simmons v. Daniel
Mark Edward Simmons |
Walter Daniel |
1:2020cv00550 |
December 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Michael J Truncale |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Michael J. Truncale: Case Management Conference held on 2/10/2021 via telephone. Attorneys present: Blair Bisbey, Caitlin Booker, Rick Anderson. Parties agree that case should be remanded. Court will enter order. (Court Reporter None.) (jmv, ) |
NOTICE of Hearing: Case Management Conference RESET for 2/10/2021 11:00 AM before District Judge Michael J. Truncale via telephone. (jmv, ) |
Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Anderson, Rick) |
NOTICE of Hearing: Case Management Conference RESET for 1/29/2021 04:00 PM before District Judge Michael J. Truncale via telephone. **TIME CHANGE ONLY** (jmv, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Walter Daniel (Anderson, Rick) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Mark Edward Simmons Initial (Bisbey, Blair) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court & Stipulation of Damages by Mark Edward Simmons. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bisbey, Blair) |
Filing 3 ORDER. Rule 26(f) attorney conference must occur by January 8, 2021. Rule 16 Case Management/Scheduling Conference set for 1/29/2021 11:00 AM via telephone before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 12/22/2020. (bjc, ) |
Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (bjc, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (bjc, ) |
Filing 2 ***ORIGINALL FILED IN STATE COURT AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** PETITION against Walter Daniel.(bjc, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walter Daniel (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8161382), filed by Walter Daniel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Petition, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Anderson, Rick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Simmons v. Daniel | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mark Edward Simmons | |
Represented By: | Blair Allan Bisbey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Walter Daniel | |
Represented By: | Rick Vandell Anderson |
Represented By: | Gregg Sandler Weinberg |
Represented By: | Caitlin Booker Feste |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.