Sanders v. Terrence Carlyle Lewis, et al
| Michael Sanders |
| CRS Logistics Inc. and Terrence Carlyle Lewis |
| 1:2021cv00159 |
| April 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Michael J Truncale |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/3/2022 at 09:00 AM in Ctrm 2 (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Jury Selection and Trial set for 2/7/2022 at 09:00 AM in Ctrm 2 (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 5/27/21. (kcv, )
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Michael J. Truncale: Management Conference held on 5/25/2021 via telephone conference. Attorneys present: Ryan Berchelmann, Olga Panchenko. Court will enter scheduling order. (Court Reporter None.) (jmv, ) |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Berchelmann, Ryan) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/13/2021: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (kcv, ). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by CRS Logistics Inc., Terrence Carlyle Lewis Defendant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement (Panchenko, Olga) Modified to correct title on 4/28/2021 (kcv, ). |
| Filing 6 Additional Attachment of the Certified Civil Cover Sheet to the #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Amended Exhibit List)(Panchenko, Olga) Modified title on 4/16/2021 (kcv, ). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER directing the parties to conduct a Rule 26(f) Attorney Conference by April 29, 2021. Rule 16 Case Management/Scheduling Conference set for 5/25/2021 at 03:30 PM via telephone (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 4/12/2021. (kcv, ) Modified to state via telephone on 4/12/2021 (kcv, ).
|
| Filing 4 ORIGINAL ANSWER filed in State Court to #2 Complaint by Terrence Carlyle Lewis.(kcv, ) |
| Filing 3 ORIGINAL ANSWER filed in State Court to #2 Complaint, by CRS Logistics Inc.(kcv, ) |
| Filing 2 ORIGINAL PETITION filed in State Court against CRS Logistics Inc., and Terrence Carlyle Lewis, filed by Michael Sanders.(kcv, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CRS Logistics Inc. from Orange County District Court, case number B210071-C. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8348290), filed by CRS Logistics Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Original Petition, #3 Exhibit Service Process, #4 Exhibit Defendant's Original Answer, #5 Exhibit Business Entity Details PA, #6 Exhibit List of Parties, #7 Exhibit List of Consel, #8 Exhibit Notice Jury Fee Paid, #9 Exhibit Court Information, #10 Exhibit Notice of Removal in State Court, #11 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(Panchenko, Olga) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury. (kcv, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (kcv, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (kcv, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
