Beebe v. Warden, FCC Beaumont Low
Petitioner: Mark Kalani Beebe
Respondent: Warden, FCC Beaumont Low
Case Number: 1:2021cv00336
Filed: July 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Keith F Giblin
Referring Judge: Michael J Truncale
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2021 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Keith Giblin pursuant to a Standing Order (tkd, )
July 1, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC 2241 filed by Mark Kalani Beebe (Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt TXE100021137) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(tkd, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beebe v. Warden, FCC Beaumont Low
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Kalani Beebe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, FCC Beaumont Low
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?