Combine Lodging, LLC v. Palomar Specialty Insurance Company
| Combine Lodging, LLC doing business as Quality Inn |
| Palomar Specialty Insurance Company |
| 1:2021cv00359 |
| July 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Michael J Truncale |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/28/2022 at 09:00 AM in Ctrm 2 (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Jury Selection and Trial set for 8/1/2022 at 09:00 AM in Ctrm 2 (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 8/26/21. (kcv, )
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jahan Vir Guram on behalf of Combine Lodging, LLC (Guram, Jahan) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Michael J. Truncale: Case Management Conference held on 8/24/2021. Attorneys present: Jahan Guram, George Arnold. Court will enter scheduling order. (Court Reporter None.) (jmv, ) |
| ***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 8, Notice of Attorney Appearance was not filed by the appearing attorney. Counsel has been notified that appearing attorney should file their own Notice of Attorney Appearance. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (kcv, ) |
| Filing 8 ***FILED IN ERROR. Please ignore.***NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Shaun Wesley Hodge on behalf of Combine Lodging, LLC (Hodge, Shaun) Modified on 8/19/2021 (kcv, ). |
| Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Scheduling Order Deadlines)(Arnold, George) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED ANSWER to #3 Complaint by Palomar Specialty Insurance Company. (Arnold, George) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER directing the parties to conduct a Rule 26(f) Attorney Conference by August 4, 2021. Rule 16 Case Managment/Scheduling Conference set for 8/24/2021 at 11:30 AM in Ctrm 2 (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 7/15/21. (kcv, )
|
| Filing 4 ORIGINAL ANSWER filed in State Court to #3 Original Petition by Palomar Specialty Insurance Company.(kcv, ) |
| Filing 3 ORIGINAL PETITION filed in State Court against Palomar Specialty Insurance Company, filed by Combine Lodging, LLC.(kcv, ) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Palomar Specialty Insurance Company. (Arnold, George) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Palomar Specialty Insurance Company from 172nd Judicial District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, case number E-207782. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8492723), filed by Palomar Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Arnold, George) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (kcv, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury. (kcv, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (kcv, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
