Ross v. Middleton et al
| Leonard Djuan Ross |
| Jim Middleton, David Dobbs, Federal Government, 7th District Court Judge and Smith County Prosecutor Office |
| 1:2021cv00413 |
| August 9, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Zack Hawthorn |
| Michael J Truncale |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 PRO SE MOTION to Amend Original Due Process of Law Complaint by Leonard Djuan Ross. (bmf, ) |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Leonard Djuan Ross on 9/14/2021 re #4 Order. (bjc, ) |
Filing 4
ORDERED that petitioner has twenty days from the date of this order to file an amended pleading that contains a more detailed factual discussion explaining his basis of recovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 9/8/2021. (bjc, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for hearing on the question of law of the disputed issue of breach of a Federal and State non-murder prosecution immunity agreement by Leonard Djuan Ross. (bjc, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leonard Djuan Ross. (bjc, ) |
| Filing 1 28:1331 BIVENS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Leonard Djuan Ross. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bjc, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (bjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
