Brinson v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al
| Jay Brinson, Keely Strother and Scott Lawson |
| Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Sperry Rail, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00501 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marcia A Crone |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Mitchell D Diles on behalf of Sperry Rail, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-8685112. (Diles, Mitchell) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE by Jay Brinson Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan Under Rule 26(f) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Coon, Brent) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE by Sperry Rail, Inc. of Service of Initial Disclosures (Indest, Miles) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Kansas City Southern Railway Company (Smith, Jim) |
| Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 Motion to Dismiss filed by Sperry Rail, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Indest, Miles) |
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 11/1/2021. (bjc, )
|
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply to Plaintiff's Response #14 to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Sperry Rail, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order Granting Leave to Extend Deadline to file Reply to November 10, 2021)(Indest, Miles) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2021: #3 Revised Proposed Order) (bjc, ). |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #6 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Class Action Petition Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. 12(b)(6) filed by Jay Brinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Coon, Brent) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Kenneth W Abrams on behalf of Sperry Rail, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-8644818. (Abrams, Kenneth) |
| NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference set for 12/17/2021 at 3:30 PM in Beaumont Courthouse before District Judge Marcia A. Crone. Counsel must appear in person.(jc, ) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to extend time for plaintiffs to respond to defendant Sperry Rail Inc's 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 10/12/2021. (bjc, )
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jim Mitchell Smith and Toby F Nash on behalf of Kansas City Southern Railway Company (Smith, Jim) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Extend Time for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant Sperry Rail, Inc's 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss by Jay Brinson, Keely Strother, Scott Lawson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Coon, Brent) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/8/2021: #3 Revised Proposed Order) (bjc, ). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER to conduct Rule 26(f) conference no later than November 5, 2021. Joint written report filed no later than November 19, 2021. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 10/6/2021. (bjc, )
|
| Case assigned to District Judge Marcia A. Crone. (ljw, ) |
| Filing 24 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** ANSWER to #22 Petition by Kansas City Southern Railway Company.(bjc, ) |
| Filing 23 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** AMENDED PETITION against Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Sperry Rail, Inc..(bjc, ) |
| Filing 22 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** PETITION against Kansas City Southern Railway Company.(bjc, ) |
| Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Texas Southern; Case Number 4:21-cv-03086. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont; granting #4 Motion to Transfer Case. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(olindor, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/4/2021.]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Petition by Sperry Rail, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 10/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Indest, Miles) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/4/2021.] |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Conference re: #4 MOTION to Transfer Case to Eastern District of Texas by Sperry Rail, Inc., filed.(Indest, Miles) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/4/2021.] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Transfer Case to Eastern District of Texas by Sperry Rail, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 10/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion to Transfer Venue)(Indest, Miles) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/4/2021.] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/21/2022 at 02:15 PM in Room 11521 before Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(RachelSalazar, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/4/2021.]
|
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sperry Rail, Inc., filed.(Indest, Miles) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/4/2021.] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County 128th Judicial District Court, case number A200964-C (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27084714) filed by Sperry Rail, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Copies of All the State Court Documents filed to date)(Indest, Miles) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/4/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
