Chase v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Benjamin Chase |
US Bureau of Prisons |
1:2021cv00521 |
October 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Marcia A Crone |
Thad Heartfield |
Christine L Stetson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER transferring case. Case reassigned to District Judge Thad Heartfield for all further proceedings. District Judge Marcia A. Crone no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 11/5/2021. (bjc, ) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 10/25/2021. (bjc, ) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Benjamin Chase. (bjc, ) |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of California Northern; Case Number 3:21-cv-07566. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Remark: Case file electronically transferred to the Eastern District of Texas. (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2021) [Transferred from California Northern on 10/18/2021.] |
Case assigned to District Judge Marcia A. Crone. (bjc, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson. (bjc, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/15/2021. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) [Transferred from California Northern on 10/18/2021.] |
Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) [Transferred from California Northern on 10/18/2021.] |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 11/8/2021. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) [Transferred from California Northern on 10/18/2021.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Filed byBenjamin Chase. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021) [Transferred from California Northern on 10/18/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chase v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Benjamin Chase | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: US Bureau of Prisons | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.