Vanous v. Cordle et al
John Vanous |
Thomas A Cordle, Jr and Roshanda Y Poullord |
1:2022cv00010 |
January 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Marcia A Crone |
Christine L Stetson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Vanous. (bjc, ) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by John Vanous re #3 Report and Recommendation. (bjc, ) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that this civil action ( #2 Complaint) should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff chooses not to proceed in forma pauperis, he may submit the full filing fee of $402.00 and the Report and Recommendation will be withdrawn. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 1/11/22. (kcv, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by John Vanous.(bjc, ) (Originally filed in 1:20cv536) |
Filing 1 ORDERED that the claim against Major Cordle and Sergeant Poullord is severed into a separate lawsuit. The supplemental complaint described above shall be filed as the initial pleading in the new lawsuit and Major Cordle and Sergeant Poullord shall be listed as the defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 1/6/2022. (bjc, ) (Originally filed in 1:20cv536) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson. (bjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.