Gallow v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Daniel Ray Gallow |
Director, TDCJ-CID |
1:2022cv00088 |
February 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Zack Hawthorn |
Michael J Truncale |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT. It is ordered that this petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed without prejudice. All motions not previously ruled on are denied. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 4/27/22. (kcv, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER overruling Petitioner's Objections and adopting the #4 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 4/27/22. (kcv, ) |
Filing 6 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Daniel Ray Gallow. (Received from US COA 5th Circuit) (kcv, ) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Daniel Ray Gallow (no date indicated) as to #4 Report and Recommendation. (kcv, ) |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that this #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should be dismissed without prejudice as a successive petition, filed without authorization from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 3/29/22. (kcv, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (kcv, ) |
Case transferred in from Tyler Division on 03/02/2022 Case Number 6:22-cv-82. Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale.(kcv, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF TRANSFER. The petition is TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division. The Clerk of Court shall transfer the case forthwith and without delay. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 3/2/2022. (wea, ) |
Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (wea, ) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 6-59785 (wea, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. MAILED Consent form to Petitioner. (wea, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.), filed by Daniel Ray Gallow. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope(s))(wea, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gallow v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Daniel Ray Gallow | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.