Aspiration Innovation, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
Aspiration Innovation, Inc. |
Ford Motor Company |
1:2022cv00112 |
March 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Michael J Truncale |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bjc, ) |
Filing 16 ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice, and the parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Ordered that all Court dates and deadlines are hereby vacated, and all pending motions filed herein are denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 9/15/2022. (bjc, ) |
Filing 15 SETTLEMENT Papers & MOTION to Dismiss by Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Connor, Michael) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is now August 31, 2022. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 8/23/2022. (bjc, ) |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Connor, Michael) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise to Plaintiff's complaint is now August 17, 2022. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 8/4/2022. (bjc, ) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Connor, Michael) |
***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 9, Application for extension of time to answer complaint. Requesting more than 45 days. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (bjc, ) |
Filing 9 ***FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE IGNORE.*** Defendant's Unopposed Third Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Ford Motor Company.( Connor, Michael) Modified on 8/1/2022 (bjc, ). |
Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Ford Motor Company.( Connor, Michael) |
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Ford Motor Company to 8/2/2022. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ljw, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael S Connor on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Connor, Michael) |
Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Ford Motor Company.( Connor, Michael) |
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Ford Motor Company to 7/18/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( bjc, ) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Ford Motor Company on 5/26/22, filed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. (Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued and emailed to plaintiff's attorney for service as to Ford Motor Company. (bjc, ) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc. (Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Anderson, Kirk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Ford Motor Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8829375.), filed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B1, #3 Exhibit B2, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Anderson, Kirk) Modified on 3/15/2022 (bjc, ). |
Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (bjc, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (bjc, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. (bjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Aspiration Innovation, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Aspiration Innovation, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Kirk Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
Represented By: | Michael S Connor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.