Jarrell v. Young et al
| Tamara Lee Jarrell |
| James Denson Young and Thomas William Mangham |
| 1:2022cv00155 |
| April 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marcia A Crone |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Disclosure by Tamara Lee Jarrell (Sparks, Mark) Modified on 5/13/2022 (tkd, ). |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Reset Scheduling Conference. Hearing is rescheduled to 7/28/2022 at 3:00 PM. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 5/4/22. (tkd, )
|
| NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference reset for 7/28/2022 at 3:00 PM in Ctrm 3 (Beaumont) before District Judge Marcia A. Crone. (tkd, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference by Thomas William Mangham, James Denson Young. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Lewis, Clint) |
| Filing 6 FILED IN ERROR. Please ignore. MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference by Thomas William Mangham, James Denson Young. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Lewis, Clint) Modified on 4/27/2022 (tkd, ). |
| ***FILED IN ERROR. Please ignore doc #6, Defts' Motion to Reset Scheduling Conference. Attorney must re-file with a certificate of conference and proposed order. (tkd, ) |
| NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference set for 7/6/2022 at 3:00 PM in Ctrm 3 (Beaumont) before District Judge Marcia A. Crone. Counsel must appear in person.(jc, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO CONDUCT RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 4/22/22. (ljw, )
|
| Filing 4 ORIGINAL ANSWER (filed in state court) to #2 Original Petition, filed by Thomas William Mangham.(tkd, ) |
| Filing 3 ORIGINAL ANSWER (filed in state court) to #2 Original Petition, filed by James Denson Young.(tkd, ) |
| Filing 2 ORIGINAL PETITION (filed in state court) against Thomas William Mangham, James Denson Young, filed by Tamara Lee Jarrell.(tkd, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Thomas William Mangham, James Denson Young from 60th Judicial District Court, Jefferson County, Texas, case number B-209447. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8876030), filed by Thomas William Mangham, James Denson Young. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Original Petition and service, #2 Exhibit Defendant (Young) Answer, #3 Exhibit Defendant (Mangham) Answer, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplement Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Index of Documents, #7 Listing of All Parties, #8 Certified Copy - Civil Docket Sheet, #9 Jury Demand, #10 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal)(Lewis, Clint) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Marcia A. Crone. (tkd, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (tkd, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Tamara Lee Jarrell, Thomas William Mangham, James Denson Young. (tkd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
